Legal research: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Posted on March 3, 2010. Filed under: Practice Management, Productivity, Research, The times they are a'changin', Web 2.0 | Tags: , , , , , , , , |

Drlogo11This week’s Daily Record column is entitled “Legal research: the good the bad and the ugly.”

A pdf of the article can be found here and my past Daily Record articles can be accessed here.

******

Legal research: the good, the bad and the ugly.

There is a grand scale transformation of legal research plat- forms occurring right now, which is a good thing for the legal profession as a whole.

While none of the existing services are necessarily ugly or bad, some of the most prominent platforms — ones with which we lawyers have always had a love/hate relationship — are antiquated and have been in desperate need of a re-haul for years now.
New entrants into the legal research space have caused fierce competition for customers. The increased competition has resulted in a rich variety of legal research options for lawyers. Some services provide more in-depth results than others, some have very user- friendly interfaces and some are inexpensive, or even free.

At LegalTech New York in February, the two largest, most familiar and most costly legal research platforms in the industry rolled out new products as part of an attempt to keep their offerings fresh and current.

Westlaw introduced WestlawNext, the next generation of Westlaw, a platform that had not changed substantially since its last revamp in 1998. An online brochure describes the platform: “Legal research that’s more human gives you an easier way to search, yet delivers all of what you’re looking for. … [Y]ou can apply intelligent tools to help you work smarter and faster with total confidence you have the information you need. All of which makes life easier.”
There has been some criticism expressed in the legal blogos- phere regarding the added “premium” users must pay in order to access the new platform, and some have decried West’s apparent lack of transparency in that regard.

LexisNexis also announced plans to roll out a new version of its platform, tentatively called “Lexis New,” later this year. In the meantime, Lexis introduced Lexis/Microsoft Office inte- gration, also during LegalTech. The company’s Web site states the new product allows lawyers “reviewing a Word document or an Outlook e-mail message … [to] seamlessly access content and resources from LexisNexis, the open Web, or their law firm or corporate files.”
LexisNexis also offers an iPhone app that allows subscribers to check case citations on the fly.

Two cheaper platforms have been around for at least a decade,Fastcase (www.fastcase.com) and LoisLaw (www.loislaw.com). Both offer subscribers the ability to access case law and statutes via user-friendly Web interfaces.
Fastcase, a 10-year-old legal research company, already serves more than 380,000 lawyers nationwide and has 17 state and local bar associations as its clients. One new notable feature from Fastcase is a free iPhone app. I downloaded the app when it was first released and, in my opinion, it’s a must-have for any lawyer who owns an iPhone. It allows users to quickly and easily search Fastcase’s entire case law database using the intuitive iPhone interface. And, you certainly can’t beat the price.
Another free legal research alternative is Google Legal Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/), which debuted at the end of 2009 and offers a free searchable database of U.S. case law from federal and state courts dating back 80 years, as well as U.S. Supreme Court decisions dating back to 1791 and law review articles. Google Legal Scholar is a great resource and, for some lawyers, may offer a good alternative to the traditional legal research platforms.

Finally, a new contender is Bloomberg Law, which will be released later this year The product has been in beta testing for the last year and is offered by the well-established and well known financial news and information services media company, Bloomberg LLC. As described at its Web site, Bloomberg Law will provide an “the all-in-one legal research platform that integrates legal content with proprietary news and business intelligence.”
Many predict that the platform will appeal mostly to larger law firms as a feasible alternative to LexisNexis and Westlaw.

There is no doubt 2010 will be an interesting, and tumultuous, year for legal research providers and the lawyers who use their services. Only time will tell which platforms will win the battle for user loyalty. In the meantime, at least lawyers have far more choices than ever before.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Advertisements
Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Web 2.0: A brave new world wide web

Posted on May 16, 2008. Filed under: Web 2.0 | Tags: , , |

Here’s an interesting and timely article from The Lawyers Weekly: Web 2.0: A brave new world wide web.

Bottom line? Web 2.0 is going to “shake up the legal landscape”. You don’t say?

From the article:

With the advent of Web 2.0, we are witnessing the expansion of the web as a platform for social networking, online collaboration and user generated content. Fundamentally, these developments will shake up the legal landscape: how lawyers get work, the way they work and where they work from. For evidence, turn to these three recent ventures which embody the essence of Web 2.0: (1) Legal OnRamp (www.LegalOnRamp.com); (2) Avvo (www.Avvo.com); and, (3) Legalwise (www.legalwise.ca)…

Web 2.0 offers both promises and perils for the legal profession. Many jobs will disappear. Others will be displaced offshore. New skill sets will have to be acquired. Nobody should fear this brave new world wide web. To adapt to this new environment, consider these pointers: First, if legal work can be outsourced for significantly less money without lowering quality or raising legal concerns, it probably will be. Potential cost savings are just too great to ignore. Second, be prepared to share basic, generic legal advice in order to attract and retain clients who will pay for tailored legal advice. Bottom line: give a little, get a little. Third, the rewards of Web 2.0 will most likely be reaped by lawyers and law firms that master the art of working together while working apart.

Nicole Black

Read Full Post | Make a Comment ( 1 so far )

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...